Home/News/Opposition allege, Provincial government fails to form people's mandate on big projects
Opposition allege, Provincial government fails to form people's mandate on big projects
Jagdeep Singh
Author
Jagdeep Singh
Category
Canada
Read Time
5 min
Date
Feb 9, 2026
Share

Opposition allege, Provincial government fails to form people's mandate on big projects

February 9, 2026
By: Jagdeep Singh
Canada

Opposition allege, Provincial government fails to form people's mandate on big projects

Conservative MLA and Critic for Indigenous Relations Scott McInnis says new public information confirms the BC NDP has fundamentally altered how major resource projects are approved in British Columbia without public debate, transparency, or a clear mandate from voters.

Public materials released by the Tahltan Central Government related to the Eskay Creek and Red Chris mines confirm that projects cannot proceed without the consent of the Tahltan Central Government Board. If consent is not granted, even after a provincial reconsideration process, the project does not go ahead.

“This makes it clear that under Section 7 agreements, consent is no longer consultation, it is permission,” said McInnis. “If consent is withheld, the project stops. That represents a major shift in how Crown land decisions are made in this province.”

McInnis stressed that his comments are not a criticism of the Tahltan Nation, but of the provincial government’s approach.

“To be absolutely clear, this is through no fault of the Tahltan,” said McInnis. “The Tahltan Nation deserves economic opportunities to flourish and has every right to pursue prosperity and long-term benefits for its members. Strong Indigenous participation in resource development is a good thing and should be supported.”

“The problem here is the NDP,” McInnis added. “A weak provincial government chose to give up its governing responsibility behind closed doors, without being honest with British Columbians about what it was doing.”

McInnis said the NDP has repeatedly described Section 7 agreements as ‘partnerships’ or ‘shared decision-making,’ while failing to explain that the province no longer retains final authority over approvals.

Published: February 9, 2026Updated: May 5, 2026
Share:
shape
shape
4.8★ Rating • 50K+ Downloads

Download Our Mobile App

Stay connected with the latest news, podcasts, and updates. Get real-time notifications and enjoy seamless content on the go.

Real-time Updates
Offline Reading
Push Notifications
Mobile App Download